(投票)港產減排"波子" 聲稱省油21.9%, 你信唔信?

Addicted

回覆 elliswong 的帖子

如果你真係汪生的話，我好希望你可以將你產品嘅所有你所講嘅認可報告喺度或其他網頁公開，等呢度各位有識之仕有多D資料討論。如果你個產品係得嘅，對你都有好處。你出一出現又龜縮，蝕底嘅係你!

elliswong

回覆 ovaries 的帖子

i have over 120 items of invention and utility patents including this.  fuel savers are selling very well in hong kong, 5  dealers are selling well. tested ok with hunan tv broadcasting last week apart from hk govt. previouslly, are they also nuts ?  or else sipo  and tuv are  nuts?

elliswong

回覆 Addicted 的帖子

thanks, i have shown in some discussion zones, also present in facebook, apart from many forum and seminars and syposiums internationally.

elliswong

the products are selling very well in hong kong by 6 dealers.  hunan tv group has tested okay with amny others.

Addicted

回覆 elliswong 的帖子

Hey, congratulations! Your "selling very well" dealer network just grew by 20%, from 5 to 6, within a 30 minute span!

But we still want to see the report in detail, please. No facts no discussion.

newyorkboy

其實唔止機電處要話 OK. 各大車行都要話落左ＥＤ波子對車既油箱冇害. 車行唔講, 車主點敢亂用. 政府係有信心, 咪話佢比 50%. 車主比 $1000 就可以買到. 重可以話如果新車有ＥＤ波子, 可以減稅. 車行一定會去試用. 有政府出尼拍心口保証, 又有車行話冇害, 再揾香港ＤＴＶ台做下報告. 禁車主或者會羅架車試下, 如果真係減到 20% 用油, 又環保減Ｄ廢氣, 對荷包對環保亦係一件好事.
推銷環保新產品, 冇政府支持, 係好難成功的

Addicted

回覆 newyorkboy 的帖子

而家講點推行仲係言之過早。而家我地要求既係數據同所謂既報告，好讓我地巴打自己有得分析產品本身優劣，唔好人講我地就信。但已經好幾日，呢位elliswong仍然只係拋一堆jargons同冇証據既所謂認可，咁係冇可信性既!

香港政府?算啦…如果坐得四個人既CLS350都係環保車，開篷Benz跑又環保車，520i同320i同一副引擎320i慳油D但反而得520i有環保優惠的話,你覺得有關官員有思考邏輯嗎?

elliswong

回覆 Addicted 的帖子

already patented.  they sells very well in hong kong now

elliswong

回覆 Addicted 的帖子

i cannot show the govt reporrt without her consent. sorry, but tuv and university of  hk poly and yanmar and CEL from germany, hk, japan and usa can prove them soundly.

elliswong

回覆 newyorkboy 的帖子

thank you. it really works. there are 7 dealers now sells very well with compliments and apprisals.  it works with physic changes, not  chemical reactions though.

elliswong

回覆 newyorkboy 的帖子

yes, govt support will be good for evrybody, with her financial supports esp.

elliswong

回覆 Addicted 的帖子

i want to help, yr suggestions are right. i can post here if u want, there are many many certs, facts, and successful cases. theory etc, the catalog is 6.5 M

Addicted

回覆 elliswong 的帖子

So far you are only talking but no walking. If you are going to show, show it!
5 and 6 and now 7 dealers, in a span of 30 hours. You are not helping yourself but giving the image to other people that you are just bullshiting.

newyorkboy

elliswong 發表於 2012-5-3 16:32
回覆 Addicted 的帖子

i cannot show the govt reporrt without her consent. sorry, but tuv and univers ...

Dear Ellis Wong:
Environmental product is always a government regulated product first and a consumer product second. Without government incentive or regulation, few consumers would automatically purchase environmental friendly products. The forced conversion of all Hong Kong taxis to LPG from petro was a good example.  When the technology is mature enough, then government stepped in to provide incentive and enforcement.  To be successful, environmental products should only be developed and commercialized in accordance with government policy and with government support.  Venture capital may fund some of these products with the hope of making a killing. That rarely happens if it is done in isolation of government support as it controls all the regulations relating to environmental friendly products.
There are many many good products never seen the day of light due to funding issue and the lack of support to properly commercialize them.  If your product is sound and delivered result as encouraged by government policy, why is the testing department refusing to allow it to be used as endorsement?

Addicted

回覆 elliswong 的帖子

我有幾條關於你呢個產品嘅問題，希望elliswong 可以解答到：

1, 你話你呢個產品係根據物理作用而非化學作用去達至慳油效果。咁呢D波子會唔會溶化或者喺外觀上有何轉變呢？如果會，個half-life rate係幾多呢？

2, 你每次點去檢測呢D波子同個器皿放入油缸後有咩變化？

3, 如果效果未如理想，希望將呢D波子抽番出嚟，有冇反效果？

4, 點樣可以將個裝住波子嘅器皿抽出？步驟如何？

5, 設計上點樣可以防止個器皿喺油缸入面唔會阻塞供油油路？

6, 你話呢件產品喺香港，德國，美國同中國內地都有做過測試。測試用咩辛烷值嘅電油？用之後有冇檢驗辛烷值變化？如有，有何變化？

如可以的話，請用中文解答。或者係我不才，睇你D英文要花多D時間思考你想表達既野!

Nadal

Addicted 發表於 2012-5-4 12:28
回覆 elliswong 的帖子

我有幾條關於你呢個產品嘅問題，希望elliswong 可以解答到：

sensible challenge!

Addicted

回覆 Nadal 的帖子

Unfortunately he doesn't give himself and us a chance to have some sensible debate. I wonder if it has anything to do with the questions i raised regarding his miracle product.

細峰

呃人?  如果OK新車就用左啦

elliswong

回覆 Addicted 的帖子

1.因是金屬,不會溶化
2.有 TUV 証書,沒有化學變化,冇化學物質留下,不塞喉,可走多些里程,廢氣儀測出減排
3.用尼龍線把它拉出則可,
4.器皿不用抽出, 它是整体連波子
5.冇化學物質留下,不塞喉
6.是的,不同級電油也有試,愈高省的愈多,物理作用至近完全燃燒,劾率高!

elliswong

回覆 newyorkboy 的帖子

thanks, i am working on it after meeting with taxi association with a fuel supplier, also working with hk government with emsd, will attempt environmental bureau. taxi ass. is also doing the same cureently.  wish luck and chance allow me to prove, already test okay with 2 taxi companies, works very well with tremendous performance on lpg saving and carbon and Nox reductions.  very good advice, thx.