(投票)港產減排"波子" 聲稱省油21.9%, 你信唔信?

Addicted

嗰D一粒粒嘢好似臭丸…你會唔會用？


超導體金屬經高温處理，再與陶瓷結合，便成白色的「減排波子」，放入金屬容器，便成節能減排裝置。（吳光熙攝）


港產工程師汪荃手上的小小裝置，便是裝有「減排波子」的裝置，只要投入油缸，便可省油減排。（吳光熙攝）

助徹底燃燒汽油 汽車省油兩成
【明報專訊】路邊空氣污染一直是本港空氣質素差的「元兇」，有港產工程師研發了新式減排裝置，以高温超導體金屬混合陶瓷，製成一粒粒的「減排波子」，只要放進油缸，便能令汽油燃燒得更徹底，可以省油兩成之餘，也能減低六成以上廢氣排放。
「減排波子」已通過機電署、德國檢測機構 TUV Rheinland Lab等測試，其中機電署經初步測試，在80公里的路程上比較客貨車安裝裝置前後的耗油量，確認裝置可省油21.9%，不過仍需經檢定中心作全面測試，才可確定其減排及省油功能。TUV 的測試亦證實，裝置可省油14%；而減排成效方面，一氧化碳可減62.5%，碳氫化物則減71.4%。
超導體金屬混陶瓷製成
參與研發的本地工程師汪荃表示，當引擎燃燒室的汽油未完全燃燒，除了減少汽車動力，亦會產生大量廢氣。他們利用經高溫處理的超導體金屬，混合陶瓷製成一粒粒的小圓球，將載着圓球的金屬容器放進油缸，便可收節能減排效果。汪解釋，裝置投入油缸後，粒子會放出電波，在燃油燃燒時協助打散粒子，讓汽油完全燃燒。
售2000元 每次用5年
汪荃透露，已製作不同大小型號的裝置，供不同汽車使用，其中私家車使用的版本約2000多元，較市面上其他減排裝置便宜，而每次可用5年，較其他裝置約2年更換一次為長，相信能迅速普及。
為改善路邊空氣質素，環保署計劃2013年引入路邊遙測設備，在全港100個繁忙單程路段抽樣偵測，如車輛被偵察出排放過量廢氣，而再作測試仍未能過關，會吊銷有關車輛牌照。鑑於環保署數據顯示，全港八成的士和四成半小巴廢氣排放超標，汪荃正與台灣公司對石油氣版本的「減排波子」作最後測試，希望能助石油氣職業車達標。

billy901

Addicted 發表於 2012-4-10 18:38
嗰D一粒粒嘢好似臭丸…你會唔會用？

c HING, 你自已點睇, 會試嗎?

Addicted

billy901 發表於 2012-4-11 00:15
c HING, 你自已點睇, 會試嗎?

我第一句都已經講得好白喎
你試吓 Google "Mothball Fuel Saver", 自己研究吓

fatdragon167

小弟唔系好信，亦未必會用。小弟個人認為省油減排可能和引擎關系比較大，類似的概念應該在引擎部分。還有，萬一波子溶化了塞住fuel line點算？

leo55555

其實台灣最多呢d神奇野..一年一千幾百款推出市場...

Addicted

回覆 leo55555 的帖子

題外話,呢個世界有蠢人先定有騙子先?

leo55555

回覆 Addicted 的帖子

應該係有蠢人先,因為騙子應該唔會太蠢..

AAP1175

有無得試下呀??

Addicted

回覆 AAP1175 的帖子

I don't know. If you dare to try with your own car, I am sure the "engineer" will be more than happy to deal with you.  Just google his name and he has his contact info listed on his many blogs.

fatdragon167

回覆 Addicted 的帖子

蠢人唔會覺得自己蠢，一定話自己好醒，但D騙子手法實在太高明。

bigbigball

@@ 係真唔係丫~

KKTT

i dont wanna try those in my car.....

335i

為支持本站的質素提昇，請多向不同的會員評分(尤其是用心發表的會員)，多謝合作！

gc63hk

若是証實有效，對環保有很大幫助

losemysoul

信機電處啦,斷估機電處唔會呃人掛,
如果真係WORK又對架車冇乜SIDE EFFECT
我諗佢會發達lol

elliswong

this carbon reduction fuel saver is made bt high temperature superconductance ( ceramic is made by V2 O5, also noble metal ), it radiates fra-infrared upto microwave, breaking down large cluster petroleum molecule into more and smaller indivisual HC molecules, it recebtly tested okay by hunan TV, apart from many successful tests previously, with TUV  ( Germany )and USA and Japan top third parties test houses, and governments.

chubby10

elliswong 發表於 2012-4-30 00:11
this carbon reduction fuel saver is made bt high temperature superconductance ( ceramic is made by V ...

No offense, throwing a bunch of science "SOUNDING" terms together doesn't make it scientific nor legit.

Common sense, wouldn't these "marbles" clog the fuel line?  Seriously, I wonder how much the repair will cost if these things get stuck in the fuel system.

A nasty joke, put a ping pong into the fuel tank of someone you don't like.  The car will just stall at random (whenever the ping pong get sucked down and block the fuel line).  Now just think of it with these smaller marbles (and they don't float like a ping pong)...  Also, modern cars use catalytic converter in their fuel system.  It is well known that if the car stall when you run out of fuel, it will damage the catalytic converter.

Don't tell me they desolve...  Ceramic doesn't desolve.

Addicted

elliswong 發表於 2012-4-30 16:11
this carbon reduction fuel saver is made bt high temperature superconductance ( ceramic is made by V ...

難道呢位elliswong 就係相中那位?

ovaries

I am not convinced that this has a chance to work. Pseudo-science jargon. The fuel injection system meter a certain amount of fuel inside the cylinder and it is ignited. The EFI system does not know that it should put less fuel in due to the presence of the pellets. If you don't put the right amount of fuel in you have "lean burn" which will REDUCE the power output. If anything, the driver compensate by applying more on the accelerator and use more fuel. You don't get something from nothing.

it radiates fra-infrared upto microwave, breaking down large cluster petroleum molecule into more and smaller indivisual HC molecules

Gasoline are short chain hydrocarbon with 8 carbon molecules....

If you want smaller hydrocarbon sometimes ethanol are added, but it has less energy stored by volume and in fact having the shorter chain HC molecules increases fuel consumption.

Please explain?

ovaries

Addicted 發表於 2012-5-1 12:46
難道呢位elliswong 就係相中那位?

The same name appear in his blog...

ellis wong、汪荃
汪荃,字敦義,祖籍廣東陽春, 華美達公司ceo,專做省油器,淨水器, LED,太陽能系列產品

His blog has 8 views including myself since its inception.