發燒友的十大謬論 (二)

江交樂

Hi-Fi器材一分錢一分貨
最貴並不代表最好,但平野就肯定冇好野

pokerusa

柒喜 發表於 2013-10-7 02:27
要回報高就要多花心思落套音響，器材是講求匹配，話之你幾百萬

師兄所言甚是~  不論做什麼，都應該要先花功夫做好準備
音響也是如此，不然就只是燒錢，還不一定能有好的效果呈現~~

柒喜

江交樂 發表於 2013-10-7 20:20
先回覆8
CD直入後級我都曾經試過,但感覺完全欠缺動態
雖然CD/DAC的output有足夠推動後級能力

絕對讚同

kingofjohn2004

器材越貴，聲音越好?
有時候價錢爭20%
分分鐘平嘢有好

leonatalie

各人喜愛唔同
音響一聽要自己試
人地個setting未必啱自己

copperman

回復 柒喜 #1 的帖子

貴野只係滿足有錢人的優越感，或者係滿足個人虛榮。

auraheart

copperman 發表於 2013-10-15 23:09
回復 柒喜 #1 的帖子

貴野只係滿足有錢人的優越感，或者係滿足個人虛榮。

I am cheap myself, I always try to get what is the best for my money.  For hi fi,  you never know when you run into something you have to have even at high cost and there is no substitute.  It does not happen a lot, but happened to me.

copperman

回復 auraheart #87 的帖子

我講既貴野對每個人標準都唔同，但在心裡面，到底係咪真係好需要，係心頭好呢？定還是只係占有欲呢？唯有自己最清楚，

auraheart

copperman 發表於 2013-10-17 06:26
回復 auraheart #87 的帖子

我講既貴野對每個人標準都唔同，但在心裡面，到底係咪真係好需要，係心頭好呢？定還是只係占有欲呢？唯有自己最清楚，

We all experience and feel differently.  Only reason why I got to have it is because it is good even at times, price / performance ratio is out of proportion.

柒喜

copperman 發表於 2013-10-15 23:09
回復 柒喜 #1 的帖子

貴野只係滿足有錢人的優越感，或者係滿足個人虛榮。

一分錢一分貨，睇你點睇囉。現今世界就連食品也太多奢侈，譬喻零食/烈酒，有損健康，為求心中慾望大多人也顧不了那麼多。人生匆匆數十年，有能力做自己喜愛的事情也算不枉此身如著實說虛榮，電腦是虛榮、智能手機是虛榮、波鞋是虛榮、電視是虛榮、洗衣機是虛榮、看電影是虛榮，就連找小姐也是虛榮。我只是普通城市人，生活上充斥著虛榮，要不虛榮只有活在第三世界，只要活得開心，管他媽的虛榮不虛榮。

柒喜

auraheart 發表於 2013-10-17 06:43
We all experience and feel differently.  Only reason why I got to have it is because it is good ev ...

你都係虛榮

auraheart

柒喜 發表於 2013-10-18 08:40
你都係虛榮

I am both cheap and 虛榮,   not too late to know, lol...活在第三世界係不能虛榮, haha..

柒喜

auraheart 發表於 2013-10-18 08:42
I am both cheap and 虛榮,   not too late to know, lol...

現今繁榮社會，什麼也是虛榮。好似大陸咁，平均月薪二三千，但就算唔食飯都要買部四五千既平果歐洲人就好少少，早幾年仲睇緊影帶

auraheart

柒喜 發表於 2013-10-18 08:48
現今繁榮社會，什麼也是虛榮。好似大陸咁，平均月薪二三千，但就算唔食飯都要買部四五千既平果歐洲人就好少少，早幾年仲睇緊影帶

虛榮 is not a bad thing, energy to drive forward..work on what you like to have.  I see no problem with that.    Of course, too much is not good, 好似大陸咁, hehe.  Not as bad here though.

柒喜

auraheart 發表於 2013-10-18 08:52
虛榮 is not a bad thing, energy to drive forward..work on what you like to have.  I see no problem ...

虛榮是一種無形推動力，推動你賺多點錢，推動你吃好著好，有乜唔好

leungpakin

各有各喜好啦...

waiwaiyick

回復 pokerusa #82 的帖子

非常贊同上面81/82樓師兄所言

老牛愛上網

前級以前用黑膠碟嘅時代，系必須要嘅， 應為刻錄膠碟嘅時候， 考慮到刻線要幼細， 低音16 Hz， 高音18，000 Hz,假如唔加以處理， 系冇可能一隻12寸碟刻錄十幾隻歌， 加入左一個 RIAA 均衡系統， 將低音壓縮， 高音曠大， 條刻錄出黎嘅線就好直，所以前級有一個將 RIAA 還原嘅功能 ， 播放嘅時候加大縮小， 將原本嘅音質還原。
而家乜野都電子化， 呢個RIAA已經唔需要啦， 除非你老兄重玩黑膠碟啦。 所以， 前級都唔需要啦， 直出就得。

auraheart

封牛集團 發表於 2013-11-7 10:08
前級以前用黑膠碟嘅時代，系必須要嘅， 應為刻錄膠碟嘅時候， 考慮到刻線要幼細， 低音16 Hz， 高音18，000 ...

This is interesting.. "播放嘅時候加大縮小"..I always thought RIAA is pre-emphasis only on recording and de-emphasis only on playback.  Example I can think of is on playback @ 7950 micro second (20hz) that is at 20db and starts to drop to zero DB at 1khz and continued dropping to -20db @20Khz.  Recording is just the reverse process.  In addition to greater recording time, it also would improve sound quality and reduce groove damage during playback.  Decent phone pre-amp specs it from 20hz-20khz +- .2db.   Typically from 30hz to 15khz is more/less matters.  Never heard of a 16hz and 18khz thingy...maybe a new lesson to learn?

Other than the RIAA equalization, the out put voltage (signal)  of the cartridge is very low, usually just a few mil-volt, moving coils are even worst.  A phone amp is required.  The flat amp may or may not be needed depends on the gain of the phone amp.   It is usually there for volume, tone, and other functions in addition to amplification.  Cd direct to amp is just no feels, lack of dynamic headroom and don't sound good to me.

老牛愛上網

auraheart 發表於 2013-11-7 11:56
This is interesting.. "播放嘅時候加大縮小"..I always thought RIAA is pre-emphasis only on recordin ...

16hz to 18,000 hz are just for example only