找回密碼
 註冊
查看: 14979|回覆: 18

CFA 定FRM

[複製鏈接]
簽到
33

8

主題

236

回帖

100

積分

初級會員

積分
100
發表於 2014-6-26 17:56:28 | |閱讀模式
邊樣會實用D 同易D呢?

0

主題

379

回帖

1930

積分

金牌會員

積分
1930
發表於 2014-7-11 09:39:16 |
CFA實用D 但五易

1

主題

159

回帖

100

積分

初級會員

積分
100
發表於 2014-7-19 16:34:47 |
都可以,FRM更好考些,一年足以.

0

主題

88

回帖

100

積分

初級會員

積分
100
發表於 2014-11-8 02:39:42 |
thank you for sharing c hing

0

主題

53

回帖

95

積分

初級會員

積分
95
發表於 2014-11-23 20:47:35 |
兩個都差幾遠

1

主題

26

回帖

81

積分

初級會員

積分
81
發表於 2014-12-26 17:50:53 |
小弟認為需要睇番自己既需要先至比較到。畢竟CFA 同 FRM 既分別都幾大

112

主題

2萬

回帖

3650

積分

論壇元老

鮑汁麻婆豆腐專家

積分
3650

傑出成就勳章「友誼大使」勳章百萬富翁勳章「貼圖之星」勳章小遊戲王勳章超級元老勳章高級元老勳章千億富豪勳章論譠元老勳章

發表於 2014-12-27 21:32:26 |
本帖最後由 鹹濕佬 於 2014-12-27 21:35 編輯

Both CFA and FRM are highly regarded in their own fields and they are quite distinct from each other (as I presume both The CFA Institute and GARP would prefer it to be that way anyway for product/market differentiation purpose) .  If you only want to earn one of these designations you would ideally know what sort of career path you are geared towards before you make a decision to study for one of these designations.

CFA is a more general designation - its target audience are financial analysts (corporates), market analysts (macros, public sector, sell-side and buy-side), research analysts and professionals working in other industries involved in financial analysis, credit analysis and risk analysis.  In general the CFA is more widely recognised and it covers a more diverse technical skill set, albeit not very deep in terms of scope of study.

FRM is a designation specialized in financial risk management (including credit risk, market risk and liquidity risk) - It is geared towards risk control professionals in financial institutions and central banks.  It covers more quantitative analysis than even the CFA while providing a much more specialized area of study within this field.  Generally speaking however, it is less diverse in terms of topics covered in relation to the CFA and is suitable for very specific positions in the market (i.e. Treasury, Risk Control, Asset Liability Management, central banks etc).  

To put into context within an investment bank, the topics covered in FRM may not be as relevant as those covered in CFA for an analyst working in the corporate finance or private equity field.  But the FRM is very relevant to a professional working in the Risk Control, ALM desk and Corporate Treasury departments.

CFA and FRM are not only confined to professionals within financial institutions or central banks.  I personally know professionals who are members of the senior management in various corporates who hold BOTH the CFA and FRM designations.
豬肉榮與寶島PPMM意亂情迷夏日狂想曲

2

主題

132

回帖

100

積分

初級會員

積分
100
發表於 2015-2-5 16:09:55 |
CFA vs FRM
Broad vs. Focused – The key differences is that CFA curriculum covered broad range of topics in Finance. FRM is a specialized exam for gaining expertise in Risk Management.
Job Opportunities – CFA is especially useful for who want to make a career in Investment Banking, Portfolio Management or Financial Research. FRM opens up careers in Risk Management in Banks, Treasury Department
Examination Tips - CFA is slightly easier for students who have an accounting background. CFA curriculum relies heavily on Accounting Fundamentals. FRM examination on the other hand is slightly easier for those who have a quantative background as majority of foundation level topics are math based

60

主題

296

回帖

100

積分

初級會員

積分
100
發表於 2015-2-21 03:02:44 |
讀CFA要幾耐時間?

操PAST PAPER有冇用?

1

主題

37

回帖

100

積分

初級會員

積分
100
發表於 2015-2-28 00:02:45 |
CFA about 3 years, FRM 1 year, if you are lucky

4

主題

41

回帖

100

積分

初級會員

積分
100
發表於 2016-7-2 19:38:29 |
CFA嘅認受性和專業性好像高啲。

1

主題

154

回帖

870

積分

高級會員

積分
870
發表於 2016-11-7 13:09:56 |
i have both charters, and CFA, whilst more 'general', is much harder than FRM. prepared to spend all your free time prepping and revising.

3

主題

97

回帖

100

積分

初級會員

積分
100
發表於 2017-1-26 20:49:06 |
咁係CFA啦....CFA is much better!!!

0

主題

323

回帖

1807

積分

金牌會員

積分
1807

百萬富翁勳章

發表於 2017-3-23 21:05:19 |
CFA認受性較好

2

主題

57

回帖

253

積分

中級會員

積分
253
發表於 2017-4-15 15:04:37 |
CFA出名d 我自己都考緊

1

主題

95

回帖

100

積分

初級會員

積分
100
發表於 2018-8-23 00:39:59 |
Should be cfa better

1

主題

27

回帖

58

積分

初級會員

積分
58
發表於 2020-4-14 20:56:37 |
Neither of it. both means nothing to be honest

44

主題

201

回帖

100

積分

初級會員

積分
100
發表於 2020-6-18 04:04:12 |
如果無相關經驗, 考左是否較易搵到有關工作?

6

主題

258

回帖

120

積分

初級會員

積分
120
發表於 2020-11-14 15:07:40 |
CFA 好D, 可以做的工多D, 不過兩個考晒都ok

Archiver|聯絡我們|141華人社區

GMT+8, 2024-12-4 01:26

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回覆 返回頂部 返回列表