NIKON D810 搶先報導

lomei

定風波 發表於 2014-6-27 13:06
大蛇都話學唔到佢的野, 何況我 ?

你天生 2 品又典同

BECKHAM2

定風波 發表於 2014-6-27 17:13
佢轉左KEVLER 做 SHUTTER, 我有保留

乜係KEVLER

leekf333

定風波 發表於 2014-6-27 10:45
冇錢買...

去老凹

ovaries

BECKHAM2 發表於 2014-6-27 21:34
乜係KEVLER

Kevler is a very light but strong material. In the old days top end tennis racquets had kelver in the composition. Nikon used to have titanium or aluminium for their top end shutters.

810 is matured but I cannot justify spending more money at present when the D700 and D800 are hardly used and I am just an amateur. Different if I am a pro, or have a big trip overseas (not possible either due to lack of time).

BECKHAM2

ovaries 發表於 2014-6-27 20:11
Kevler is a very light but strong material. In the old days top end tennis racquets had kelver in  ...

Oh, I see.
But D3S also use kevlar as shutter material, and rate the shutter life as 300,000 count. Therefore no need to worry about.

And I also think that find a chance to travel is more important than a new camera.

ovaries

BECKHAM2 發表於 2014-6-27 23:20
Oh, I see.
But D3S also use kevlar as shutter material, and rate the shutter life as 300,000 coun ...

Yes, I enjoy your Europe pictures very much! Who cares which camera was used.

假波男

lomei 發表於 2014-6-27 18:54
你天生 2 品又典同

茅錢就天生乜SPRING都冇用

bingbar

New model comes up too frequently with minor improvement.  I think I'd rather upgrade lenses first and only upgrade body once every few years.  $3300 US is more than good for the new 80-400 AFS VR2.

定風波

bingbar 發表於 2014-6-29 09:28
New model comes up too frequently with minor improvement.  I think I'd rather upgrade lenses first a ...

F4.5~5.6 wouldn't it be a bit small aperture at the tele end ?

lomei

假波男 發表於 2014-6-28 11:26
茅錢就天生乜SPRING都冇用

$ 你更 + 無問題啦

Dragondogcat

定風波 發表於 2014-6-26 09:46
NIKON D800 的 新版本還有幾小時就正式公報.

我又試下搶先UP下先.

買左未牙

馬後砲

Dragondogcat 發表於 2014-6-29 17:19
買左未牙

美國都要七月尾先交貨。
香港可能要九月

bingbar

回復 定風波 #49 的帖子

Yes, not ideal for lo light situations.  But 5.6 still workable for outdoor wildlife/bird shots.  Besides it is something many can afford.  The next level up would be over 10,000 US or more.  No can find such $$$.

定風波

bingbar 發表於 2014-6-30 11:52
回復 定風波 #49 的帖子

Yes, not ideal for lo light situations.  But 5.6 still workable for outdoor  ...

One could look at the Tamron 150-600 as an alternative.
Sounds like a good deal. But don't know the quality.

chancheuklung

ISO去到6400多唔多noise呢

fancat

多謝師兄分享

定風波

leekf333 發表於 2014-6-27 20:06
去老凹

凸就識，老凹留番你做

leekf333

定風波 發表於 2014-7-1 10:03
凸就識，老凹留番你做

你去凸大蛇

定風波

leekf333 發表於 2014-7-1 13:02
你去凸大蛇

禾典解要凸企 ?

leekf333

定風波 發表於 2014-7-1 15:48
禾典解要凸企 ?

凸佢就會吹雞