窮人酒聚

fatloong · 發表於 2014-4-13 22:06:22

tango_one 發表於 2014-4-13 21:59
The years of those 6 bottles that you open are costly. And you open it all together.
What is the occ ...

It is gathering with my wine drinking friends and they want a vertical.... We have more than 10 people that night and of course some other wines.

Frankly this is not true vertical as they come from three different vineyards.

fatloong · 發表於 2014-4-13 22:23:12

linkjadel 發表於 2014-4-13 21:33
樓主講反話

If I am rich, these will be red labels, not white labels

小舅哥 · 發表於 2014-4-13 22:37:17

不是很喜欢皮革和焦油的感觉。。。。绿胡椒让人想象不出来啊。。。

dingpong · 發表於 2014-4-13 22:50:08

fatloong 發表於 2014-4-13 18:42
White only, no red

有咁多價值連城珍藏, 真是好窮喎

Jck28 · 發表於 2014-4-13 22:55:27

回復 fatloong #1 的帖子

C-Hing must be a good and charming man. Loves fruity young one and communicate with elder one!

fokker · 發表於 2014-4-13 23:03:23

本帖最後由 fokker 於 2014-4-13 23:04 編輯

回復 fatloong #23 的帖子

The red labels are a class of their own. I was paying about HK$600 back in around 2000 for a Santo Stefano 1989 and 1990 Riservas. Boy oh boy, the 89 tranced the 90 then in terms of complexity and length. IIt also was wine of the evening in the companies of 85 La Mission and Mouton.

The 89 Santo Stefano Riserva remains one of my most memorable wines.

ky_lucifer · 發表於 2014-4-13 23:16:03

窮因為拿晒啲錢買酒。

賣晒啲酒馬上有錢。

gooseling · 發表於 2014-4-13 23:53:07

No experience of this wine ! How does it compare with the French wines ?

andofoster · 發表於 2014-4-14 01:09:27

回復 fatloong #20 的帖子

Any further comment for all different vintage? U like them or not?

fatloong · 發表於 2014-4-14 01:44:33

gooseling 發表於 2014-4-13 23:53
No experience of this wine ! How does it compare with the French wines ?

This is just like asking how Italian food compare with French food

Even French wine differs significantly between regions, or even within a region.

In short, I think the closest comparison with French wine is Hermitage.

fatloong · 發表於 2014-4-14 01:53:11

本帖最後由 fatloong 於 2014-4-14 02:06 編輯

andofoster 發表於 2014-4-14 01:09
回復 fatloong #20 的帖子

Any further comment for all different vintage? U like them or not?

The 89 is at its peak with secondary aroma well developed.  I am a bit surprised this happened so early, may be because it is Barbaresco not Barolo, and also not a Riserva.

The 2005/2007 are surprisingly drinkable, but of course you don't want to pay so much money and drink a fruity Bruno Giacosa.

1998/2000/2003 are forward vintages, but a bit awkward at this stage, seems they are sleeping.  Some improvement after decanting.

All are great wines but the question is always: do they worth the money?  Bruno Giacosa is already not too bad, probably just about 30% is for the brand.