Frankly, except for the chassis, rest is just average and not really hi end. Dual transformers and separate boards and not even a dual mono plus manually switch on the second transformer is just like a joke, that is dummm..60,000 uf total cap is small by today's standard. Maybe they are not too experienced in building a true hi end amp, I wouldn't know. I wouldn't be interested to audit an amp which is knowingly average at best..hehe..The pre-amp is more worth my time to listen though. Can't stand that gold on black with two big knobs lol...
60 Kg is too much ! Should split into 2 monoblocks.It remind me of the monster class A Music Fidelity amplifier which was very hot to operate. This one is much cooler.
similar speakers use mean home is small...and a bit loud will be complain ...
Smaller homes are expected in HK but not likely to have much complaints because they are concrete buildings. Unlike where I live, all wood..hehe. Mostly of us don't listen to music very loudly most of the time anyway. I am into hi power gear myself, but just want to have reserve power for dynamic headroom. I still remember the day I had a total of over 1,100 watts of total power (Bi-amp, 4x12in lf driver corss-over at 120 to 150hz, Decca super tweeter). Had about 800 watts when tri-amp but come to think of it, what for?
補充內容 (2014-3-21 03:13):
True that wood buildings are better for hi fi . Requires less sound treatment but the whole house shakes when peak out..
樓主: 雜食小子
在線雷達
發表於 2014-3-20 15:09:25
發表於 2014-3-20 15:51:25
I wouldn't be interested to audit an amp which is knowingly average at best..hehe..The pre-amp is more worth my time to listen though. Can't stand that gold on black with two big knobs lol...
