最新桌上型音響系統 NAD 的 D系列

auraheart · 發表於 2014-2-14 14:08:18

本帖最後由 auraheart 於 2014-2-14 14:08 編輯

One thing that made NAD famous as a low price product it's power supply has the ability to give a little extra power when needed momentary. The new line uses switching amp, but default it also use switching power supply which took away what made them famous. I kinda expect different sounding system from NAD's tradition softer sound. Just hope it is for the better..

柒喜 · 發表於 2014-2-14 14:16:21

auraheart 發表於 2014-2-14 14:08
One thing that made NAD famous as a low price product it's power supply has the ability to give a li ...

從未認真聽過NAD

auraheart · 發表於 2014-2-14 14:18:07

柒喜發表於 2014-2-14 14:16
從未認真聽過NAD

Me either lol...only listen a bit when newbie friends wanna buy entry level system.

and that was boring..

柒喜 · 發表於 2014-2-14 14:27:46

auraheart 發表於 2014-2-14 14:18
Me either lol...only listen a bit when newbie friends wanna buy entry level system. and th ...

入門最好就玩平價膽機加Rogers，包保從此加入Hi-Fi行列

auraheart · 發表於 2014-2-14 14:29:07

柒喜發表於 2014-2-14 14:27
入門最好就玩平價膽機加Rogers，包保從此加入Hi-Fi行列

Rogers no good, not for over 3k USD..you think newbies pay over 3k for a pair of small speakers? lol..

柒喜 · 發表於 2014-2-14 14:55:59

auraheart 發表於 2014-2-14 14:29
Rogers no good, not for over 3k USD..you think newbies pay over 3k for a pair of small speakers? l ...

買Rogers就唔買新，就係佢既嚴重音染先至咁吸引

auraheart · 發表於 2014-2-14 15:48:34

本帖最後由 auraheart 於 2014-2-14 15:51 編輯

柒喜發表於 2014-2-14 14:55
買Rogers就唔買新，就係佢既嚴重音染先至咁吸引

LM 3866 土炮 + small used KEF..better choice

a lot less money..not too bad for newbies, cheaper than NAD system..

For what they charge, even used, Rogers are over rated...I am not surprised a good use pair of Rogers over 10k HKD now..

嚴重音染 = coloration? That is not a good thing..lol..