|
發表於 2012-9-20 10:57:02
|
顯示全部樓層
回復 張家輝 #39 的帖子
They are also victims of this case. The HKMA & banks management should be responsible for that. They approved and decided to sell those products to un experienced investors. In fact, even experienced investors may also be misled. Most of the front staffs were pushed to sell these products to all kind of clients. Smart or lucky staffs can meet quotas with appropriate clients. Some unlucky staffs cannot. Some very unlucky staffs sold the products to some unqualitfied investors and there still some civil cases outstanding. Furthermore, the incentive for staff at that period was not so attractive compared with the incentive nowadays.
In fact, before the settlement proposal, many bank staffs had been worrying for more than two years. Many of them felt sorry to clients. But in fact part of the clients are also experienced investors. But since the case is hot to media, they made pressure to frontline staffs regularly, just to maximize their % of compensation. All the complaints, calls, visits were not handled by bank management or HKMA. all were handled by the frontline staff.
好多朋友日日俾人唔同人小, 小足兩年! 多間銀行都有心理輔導俾front line staffs
but who started this tragedy ????
|
|