找回密碼
 註冊
樓主: namiatnahc

幾時先會出現番"無露台"及"無窗台"既單位?

    [複製鏈接]
發表於 2012-7-18 07:15:57 | 顯示全部樓層

I half agree with you c-hing.

Actually where I live, it has balcony and window bay, and even raining, if u open CERTAIN windows( in the living room) the rain won't go in as it is a 'pushed forward' design but IF there's too much wind, it will close it automatically.

I personally think even the balcony is not that necessary as most of the times, we only use it to hang landuary clothes....

and I think my balcony is around 20SQ, so for the current market price, it would cost nearly HKD 160K....
回覆 讚好 不讚 使用道具

舉報

發表於 2012-7-18 07:16:55 | 顯示全部樓層
呀吓 發表於 2012-7-16 01:07
依家環保露台同工作平台唔可以擺埋一齊了

工作平台=I personally

What's the point to have a less than 16SQ....u can HARDLY do anything!!!!! IE) even hanging clothes become a problem1!!!!x1000
回覆 讚好 不讚 使用道具

舉報

發表於 2012-7-18 07:18:46 | 顯示全部樓層
amzyn 發表於 2012-7-18 01:30
依家分開咗真係無咁好用, 我個人寧願合併番佢, 一係修改法例將環保露台加大至 40 平方呎就好啦.
22 平呎 ...

C-hing, have a look

Winfield Building, Happy Valley

The balcony Is nearly 40 SQ if i remmeber correctly, u can even put a table

Is also a New apartment ( but refurbished).
回覆 讚好 不讚 使用道具

舉報

發表於 2012-7-18 07:20:33 | 顯示全部樓層
呀吓 發表於 2012-7-16 08:32
平台原意其實是設立一個工作空間,一般應位於廚房旁,供晾曬衣服之用,並規定最少一至兩面是敞開的。 ...

My home's balcony is about 25SQ, and it can Just about to hanging clothes...

so for a 16SQ, well u can only hang clothes for 1 person....

I don't know why the government has to split it up!??
回覆 讚好 不讚 使用道具

舉報

發表於 2012-7-18 08:25:12 | 顯示全部樓層
amzyn 發表於 2012-7-18 01:30
依家分開咗真係無咁好用, 我個人寧願合併番佢, 一係修改法例將環保露台加大至 40 平方呎就好啦.
22 平呎 ...

政府如果依家將環保露台可轄免GFA既面積增加,咪即係再送多尐錢俾發展商,又會俾人小佢官商勾結,你話佢會唔會咁做?
最初環保露台同工作平台推出時,確係可以合拼係一齊既,不過又係唔知邊Q個屎忽痕咩事都反既76話咁樣違反左工作平台只係送黎俾人晾衫既用途,受到壓力政府至諗方法分開佢仲要諗好多屎橋去整到佢只可以核核突突咁。政府依家又點會行番轉頭?

根本係環保露台推出之前(約10年前),所有有露台既樓都有計GFA既,唔係送既。只係政府送左出黎所有發展商都只會起政府送果少少面積既露台,唔會再多,9而9之變左個風氣之嘛。其實只要有市場要求發展商就會供應架啦,一話送就個個都只做minimum,咪搞到依家不倫不類半桶水咁囉
回覆 讚好 不讚 使用道具

舉報

發表於 2012-7-18 18:41:08 | 顯示全部樓層
nicholasnick 發表於 2012-7-18 07:15
I half agree with you c-hing.

Actually where I live, it has balcony and window bay, and even rain ...

if u r a smoker, u will reckon a balcony is v important
to watch the sea when smoking is so relaxing  

hardly can i understand why some ppl will seal their balcony with windows & partition walls (just to increase the living area by connecting the balcony to the living rm)...for me, v stupid.....
回覆 讚好 不讚 使用道具

舉報

發表於 2012-7-18 18:44:50 | 顯示全部樓層
呀吓 發表於 2012-7-18 08:25
政府如果依家將環保露台可轄免GFA既面積增加,咪即係再送多尐錢俾發展商,又會俾人小佢官商勾結,你話佢 ...

not only 環保露台 & 工作平台 need to be split up, but also the 轄免GFA既面積 for them has decreased now
回覆 讚好 不讚 使用道具

舉報

發表於 2012-7-18 18:59:06 | 顯示全部樓層
devil666red 發表於 2012-7-18 18:44
not only 環保露台 & 工作平台 need to be split up, but also the 轄免GFA既面積 for them has decrease ...

Oh really? any more detail?
回覆 讚好 不讚 使用道具

舉報

發表於 2012-7-18 18:59:36 | 顯示全部樓層
devil666red 發表於 2012-7-18 18:41
if u r a smoker, u will reckon a balcony is v important
to watch the sea when smoking is so relax ...

aw fair enough :) yes, I am not a smoker and unfortunately there's no sea view from where i live so haha whether to have a balcony or not is not necessary to me.

Yes, I heard some people sealed their balcony, but hasn't see any new build (within 5 yrs) has done that.
回覆 讚好 不讚 使用道具

舉報

發表於 2012-7-18 19:22:12 | 顯示全部樓層
呀吓 發表於 2012-7-18 18:59
Oh really? any more detail?

至於環保露台及工作平台,前篇所講景怡峰只有露台而沒有平台,喜雅則兩者都有,這些是有限豁免面積的環保設施,說穿了就是「發水」。環保露台的豁免上限是22呎,工作平台是16呎。以前兩者是可以合併興建,成為38呎大露台,那就自然比分開22及16呎兩件好用,不過自政府規定兩者要分開,大露台的樓則已成絕響,加上「限發水10%」的新例,兩者最多只能豁免50%面積,未來「限發水則」如何處理呢?暫時都是未知。
回覆 讚好 不讚 使用道具

舉報

發表於 2012-7-25 09:21:37 | 顯示全部樓層
其實係由大家選擇,想實際一D咪買村屋囉
現在大多數分層都係咁起
回覆 讚好 不讚 使用道具

舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 註冊

本版積分規則

Archiver|聯絡我們|141華人社區

GMT+8, 2024-11-16 15:55

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回覆 返回頂部 返回列表