全 場 最 抵 100 Fun！ (~^o^~)

(~^o^~)

收到林鄭果一雞野，有錢身痕，走去睇吓有乜野紅油入？     


E 仔全場最抵羅拔仔 100 Fun！  

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

(~^o^~)

吓，有冇平 D 架？    


有有有有，e 支高 Fun 最平喇！  

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

(~^o^~)

跟住去咗屈人，嘩嘩嘩嘩，支 100 Fun 減咗都要 $4450！  

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

(~^o^~)

吓，有冇平 D 架？    


有有有有，e 支高 Fun 最平喇！  

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

(~^o^~)

吓，咁我屌咗邊隻紅油？    


$185，90 Fun，屌佢半打！     (~^o^~)

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

LasCases

笑面哥干杯。

HKOXSEX

仲未用晒一萬蚊

Winston91

回復 (~^o^~) ##1 的帖子

Grand Cru真喺飲唔起

fokker

(~^o^~) 發表於 2020-8-4 04:26

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

收到林鄭果一雞野，有錢身痕，走去睇吓有乜野紅油入？     

Robert Parker has retired. RP only represented the publication he established: "the wine advocate". I think he stopped scoring Bordeaux for a few years already. So RP 100 only meant some wine writer from the Wine Advocate scored it a 100.
In any case, this scoring system is stupid and only meant for reference. You have to fine tune your palate and align with a certain critic, and that is the best introduction to a wine before buying it.
In more ways than one, I disagree with Robert Parker, esp. in reference to Champagne and Burgundies, and Californian wines. My palate tend to align with Stephen Tanzer, who does not give out 100 pointers easily.