|
發表於 2014-9-15 18:18:34
|
顯示全部樓層
回復 kingkong_hk #82 的帖子
好似就得呢句:
They merged it with their experimental system called NT (which was based conceptually on XENIX and some other things) and called the result Windows NT.
查實如其話NT受Xenix影響, 就真係倒不如話NT受IBM OS/2影響仲好.
但係用抄埋一碟嚟形容, 可能有少少誤導.
1. NT嘅shell(如果佢有), 喺邊方面似Xenix?
2. Xenix嘅Windows Manager係乜? (如果佢有)
3. OS/2 甚至到2.1.x, mutex呢類嘢依然未掂. 雖則NT都唔見得係好,
mutex, critical section都未至於做唔到multi-threading嘅synchronization.
咁可能係抄嗰個份功課仲攞得高分過原作者都唔定.
4. 其實google揾到嘅網頁, 小弟都未見有人"一鎚定音", "一口咬定"話Microsoft 抄邊個?
咁當然抄呢個講法可以"袋"住先.
5. 反而大家要注要一下MS Xenix同SCO, 邊個出先邊個出後; Xenix最初係咩嘢機出現?
有冇喺Intel based嘅PC出現過等等嘅問題?
唔好意思又OT咗.
小弟唔係想話串嘴.
不過今天今日, 不求甚解,
唔去求證, 就提出立論,
正正就係時下所謂IT人, (甚或所有香港人)
固步自封, 自欺欺人嘅局面.
令到人人都話香港唔夠內地砌, 唔夠印度砌, 唔夠Bangladesh, 唔夠邊個邊個砌.
又一日到黑俾人話我哋, 相對新加坡, 唔keen on資訊科技.
有時小弟囉唆啲, 係希望版友, 看倌,
可以睇到一個立論/推論嘅前提,
同相關嘅資訊,
唔好一下就draw conclusion.
好似, 人哋肩膀有痣, 就一定係相中人咩?
人哋同老爺住, 個細仔就係同佢生咩?
(下刪萬九幾字)
|
|