找回密碼
 註冊
查看: 1060|回覆: 10

[喇叭] 鑑聽揚聲器 LS 3/5A 與 有源的 Adam S1x 比較

[複製鏈接]
簽到
484
發表於 2014-4-11 11:08:01 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式
本帖最後由 graffiti 於 2014-4-11 11:09 編輯

頭痛/求助:
花多些錢買有源的 adam S1X (25K+) 好呢, 還是買對LS3/5A (8K+?), 再用剩餘既錢買合適擴音机化算呢?
音色差別又会怎樣?

登入後,內容更豐富

您需要 登錄 才可以下載或查看,沒有賬號?註冊

×
發表於 2014-4-11 12:55:01 | 顯示全部樓層

未聽過S1X,無意見至於LS3/5a,分析力一般,音染之極既弦樂(一件頭)和女聲之選,但要玩得好並不容易,個人首薦用Jadis 合併機仔推(小弟以往用Jadis DA30推),一開機聲音已經完全離箱(用腳架計),弦樂超班,但聽大型樂章就有心無力,除非玩夠兩對。
回覆 讚好 不讚 使用道具

舉報

發表於 2014-4-11 14:59:16 | 顯示全部樓層
jadis is expensive
I think it will cost a lot more than 25K.
For a 2nd hand one may be, but hard to find in the 2nd hand market.
回覆 讚好 不讚 使用道具

舉報

發表於 2014-4-11 15:13:23 | 顯示全部樓層
tabooo 發表於 2014-4-11 14:59
jadis is expensive
I think it will cost a lot more than 25K.
For a 2nd hand one may be, but hard to  ...

樓上舖比較易找,亦可以叫老闆幫你找比兩三舊佢賺
回覆 讚好 不讚 使用道具

舉報

發表於 2014-4-11 15:16:54 | 顯示全部樓層
柒喜 發表於 2014-4-11 12:55
未聽過S1X,無意見至於LS3/5a,分析力一般,音染之極既弦樂(一件頭)和女聲之選,但要玩得好並不容 ...


My suggestion is to stay away from active speakers, at least for now.  Spend more on speakers (nice to consider one that is be bi-amp able).  Amp is secondary compare to speakers. I prefer electrostatic speakers.  Small pair of Maggie would be a good choice.  LS3/5a is not a big deal to me, IMHO.   Jadis?  Never-mind due to hi price unless it very cheap..something like a Luxman integrated amp is more of a practice choice.  An objective suggestion, just my 2 cents..
回覆 讚好 不讚 使用道具

舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2014-4-11 15:42:45 | 顯示全部樓層
auraheart 發表於 2014-4-11 15:16
My suggestion is to stay away from active speakers, at least for now.  Spend more on speakers (nic ...

Hearing many discussions on how true / pure sound active monitor speakers produce (without adding sauce etc..) I really want to try.
Wish to know your opinion about "stay away from active speakers."
回覆 讚好 不讚 使用道具

舉報

發表於 2014-4-11 15:53:19 | 顯示全部樓層
graffiti 發表於 2014-4-11 15:42
Hearing many discussions on how true / pure sound active monitor speakers produce (without adding  ...


Active speakers limit your choice of electronics.  You take what is build-in to the speakers.   Whether or not you like such combination, that is it, no upgrade, nothing.  Say doing it the other way, especially with a bi-amp able speaker system.  It will give up all the options you need, including electronic cross-over (active).  Much much better path for better quality.
回覆 讚好 不讚 使用道具

舉報

發表於 2014-4-11 16:03:12 | 顯示全部樓層
O, well..last reply was eaten by the system, it will come back..one more thing is the resale value of active speakers, usually not too good..another factor to consider.
回覆 讚好 不讚 使用道具

舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2014-4-11 16:08:41 | 顯示全部樓層
Yes you are right.
One (only) good thing about active speakers is that the build in amp can drive the speakers without difficulty.
If the speaker is difficulty to tame, just like the ATC, then its active speakers (eg. ATC 10A) will eliminate all the hassles
The old model ATC 20T (passive) had been a nightmare to some chings.
On the other way round if you enjoy matching and changing your gears it could be interesting.
回覆 讚好 不讚 使用道具

舉報

發表於 2014-4-11 16:16:24 | 顯示全部樓層
graffiti 發表於 2014-4-11 16:08
Yes you are right.
One (only) good thing about active speakers is that the build in amp can drive th ...

Mixing and matching will give you unexpected improvements, quite achievable with experience.  It is a nice feeling, joyful and an accomplishment.  I always like that as reward...  It could be painful along the way just like how I spend a year to tri-amp the Quad ESL system with super tweeter and sub-woofers, some unforgettable experience which I still remember years later, and enjoyed it.

補充內容 (2014-4-11 16:19):
Opps! back to the amp picture, lol...
回覆 讚好 不讚 使用道具

舉報

發表於 2014-4-11 23:23:35 | 顯示全部樓層
For active speakers, less items to play with and less fun.The worst is the HIFI consoles that you can't do anything !
回覆 讚好 不讚 使用道具

舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 註冊

本版積分規則

Archiver|聯絡我們|141華人社區

GMT+8, 2024-11-9 10:26

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回覆 返回頂部 返回列表