WhatsApp exec: Google takeover? google收購whatsapp ?

littlepants9394

Both Google and Whatsapp clarified the rumor of $1b acquisition is not true.

My opinion is that Google still need to figure out the IM area given other players liked FB and Apple have well established user base of their IM platform. Maybe Google can think about Line.

News link

馬後砲

littlepants9394 發表於 2013-4-10 00:24

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

Both Google and Whatsapp clarified the rumor of $1b acquisition is not true.

My opinion is that Go ...

WhatsApp的吸引力是，它可以橫跨iOS和Android，甚至黑莓或Windows，給fanbois，的fandroids和其他MOBE用戶一個免費的方式，通過Wi-Fi，3G或4G通信。

所以, 對google, 或其他major players來講, 有一定吸引力.

ted.ted123

google 應該睇中左whatsapp的個人資料……

littlepants9394

ted.ted123 發表於 2013-4-10 17:47

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

google 應該睇中左whatsapp的個人資料……

Thx for your comment. I don't think google is interested in user info as there is a name, contact number and photo. Really important is the large user base. And also the message is more useful than that.

馬後砲

littlepants9394 發表於 2013-4-10 23:10

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

Thx for your comment. I don't think google is interested in user info as there is a name, contact  ...

同意個USER POOL 先系主菜, GOOGLE+ 一向都差強人意

beckham3

馬後砲 發表於 2013-4-11 08:33

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

同意個USER POOL 先系主菜, GOOGLE+ 一向都差強人意

Yes, the client base is the key point, and also such kind of App have high screen occupation rate, that mean good for adv releasing.

If Google take WhatApp, Google will sure examine your communication content, and sends the relevant adv to you. Just like Gmail.

馬後砲

beckham3 發表於 2013-4-13 12:12

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

Yes, the client base is the key point, and also such kind of App have high screen occupation rate, ...

這是一個值得反思的問題 ，
當我們在炮轟某些政府對郵件(email or snail mail alike)作政治審查
的同時，
isp也對我們的電子通訊作類似分析，出售，作為圖利之用。

這樣說來，誰比誰更差勁?

政府的社會責任，人所共識，
IT企業的社會責任何在 ?

beckham3

馬後砲 發表於 2013-4-13 13:49

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

這是一個值得反思的問題 ，
當我們在炮轟某些政府對郵件(email or snail mail alike)作政治審查
的同時 ...

兩者有不同層次:
一個是思想操控及選擇性資訊準入
一個是私隱保護問題.
兩者都主要靠輿論及媒體反制.

Google辯稱, 內容嘅監聽是由電腦程式自動完成, 不經人手, 所以無外洩問題!
你收貨嗎?